0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¿å⿹¹æÀ» À§ÇÑ Ã¼À§º¯°æ ÁßÀç È¿°úÀÇ ºñ±³¼øÀ§: ³×Æ®¿öÅ© ¸ÞŸºÐ¼®

Comparative Effects and Ranks of Repositioning for Pressure Ulcer Prevention in Adults: A Network Meta-analysis

±Ù°üÀý°Ç°­ÇÐȸÁö 2022³â 29±Ç 1È£ p.18 ~ 27
KMID : 0123520220290010018
°íÁö¿î ( Ko Ji-Woon ) - SunMoon University Department of Nursing

Abstract

Purpose: A network meta-analysis was conducted to assess the comparative effects and ranks of repositioning forpressure ulcer prevention in adults.

Methods: A network meta-analysis was performed in a frequency method, using the"netmeta" package of R software version 4.1. The effects of repositioning intervention were confirmed by the odds ratio. The comparative ranking of the repositioning effects was confirmed using the cumulative probability (P-score).

Results:Seven intervention studies were included in this study. Based on the P-score, the use of the repositioning system wasranked as the most effective among all interventions (P-score 78.7%). Next was 3~4-hour repositioning combined withmemory foam mattress use (P-score 77.2%), use of wearable sensor (P-Score 61.4%), 2-hour repositioning combinedwith memory foam mattress use (P-score 59.1%), 2-hour repositioning combined with powered air pressure redistributionmattress use (P-score 18.0%), and 4-hour repositioning combined with powered air pressure redistribution mattress use(P-score 18.0%).

Conclusion: This study provides information on the relative comparative value of various repositioninginterventions to prevent pressure ulcers using network meta-analysis. This is expected to be useful for nurses'decision-making when applying repositioning interventions in clinical practice.
KeyWords

Pressure ulcer, Prevention program, Repositioning, Patient safety, Network meta-analysis
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)