|
|
|
°íÁö¿î ( Ko Ji-Woon ) - SunMoon University Department of Nursing
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
Purpose: A network meta-analysis was conducted to assess the comparative effects and ranks of repositioning forpressure ulcer prevention in adults.
Methods: A network meta-analysis was performed in a frequency method, using the"netmeta" package of R software version 4.1. The effects of repositioning intervention were confirmed by the odds ratio. The comparative ranking of the repositioning effects was confirmed using the cumulative probability (P-score).
Results:Seven intervention studies were included in this study. Based on the P-score, the use of the repositioning system wasranked as the most effective among all interventions (P-score 78.7%). Next was 3~4-hour repositioning combined withmemory foam mattress use (P-score 77.2%), use of wearable sensor (P-Score 61.4%), 2-hour repositioning combinedwith memory foam mattress use (P-score 59.1%), 2-hour repositioning combined with powered air pressure redistributionmattress use (P-score 18.0%), and 4-hour repositioning combined with powered air pressure redistribution mattress use(P-score 18.0%).
Conclusion: This study provides information on the relative comparative value of various repositioninginterventions to prevent pressure ulcers using network meta-analysis. This is expected to be useful for nurses'decision-making when applying repositioning interventions in clinical practice.
|
|
KeyWords
|
|
Pressure ulcer, Prevention program, Repositioning, Patient safety, Network meta-analysis
|
|
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
|
|
|
|
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
|
|
|
|
|
|